2fc1d37bfe590faceaa1f8024cc95ddc

The Evolution of the Humble Field Pack (2)

By Crossfire March 7, 2019

The Evolution of the Humble Field Pack (2)

Posted in by Crossfire on March 7, 2019.

Follow by Email
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest

One would think that a country’s soldiers would be afforded the very best equipment that could be provided. Up until 2001, Australia like a number of our close allies received the very best training in the world, some of the most advanced weaponry, but the worst large field packs. In the field, the soldier’s packs are their home and everything for their comfort, survival, and efficiency must be carried on their backs. Throughout World War 1 and World War 2, the packs carried by the soldiers were nothing more than bags with straps sewn into them. They were made from cotton, they became saturated in the rain and their carrying capacity was limited. The evolution of the army’s backpacks was slow and in the early 1980s, the ALICE pack was developed by the US.

Although an improvement over the preceding models, the full packs on long marches became uncomfortable and chafing not to mentioned the dreaded popped rivet after a not so soft jump. Uncomfortable, broken soldiers are inefficient soldiers and being miserable is a good road to failure. Finding a Better Solution after September 11, 2001, Australia as with most modern armies started the Rapid Fielding Initiative to equip their warfighters with the best state of the art equipment to enhance their mobility, lethality, and survivability in the fields of Afghanistan and Iraq.

As part of this initiative, the MOLLE pack was developed. M.O.L.L.E. stands for ‘modular lightweight load-carrying equipment’. It is constructed of 1000 Denier Cordura, it has an external pack frame, a shoulder strap assembly, waist belt, and a quick release. The main rucksack is 3000 cu in. and houses the Gortex sleeping system, night vision goggles, GPS, personal items and body armor. There are pouches for grenades, a hydration bladder that eliminates canteens and there is a separate assault pack to carry extra ammunition. The MOLLE pack has seen extensive service by all nations involved in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001. However, soldiers in the field voiced criticisms of certain aspects of the MOLLE design. For example, the external plastic frame of the main pack was prone to breakdown under field conditions and a number of lower back injuries were attributed to the ball-and-socket mechanism between the frame and waist-belt. In addition, the straps were too short to accommodate body armor.

Since 2001 the search for the optimal field pack has continued. The Australian model seems to have largely followed for better or worse the US model of bigger, wider, more pouches for the field pack large. The experience of the civilian mountaineering world seems to have been largely excluded or ignored. The revolution in the civilian world in both type of materials used for both frames and bag and the frame sizing has very much left defense in its shadow. The days of one size fits all and the thought process that a pack has been 1000D to be robust enough is very much gone the way of the dodo. The Crossfire DG family of packs begin to represent the innovation of the civilian mountaineering into the military environment.